Post-Colonial Literary Theory
Let's be real: colonialism was an ugly thing. A bunch of Europeans basically went off into the four corners of the globe—into Africa, Asia, South America (not to mentionNorth America)—and pillaged other people's land, their resources, their minerals, and their labor... and grew filthy rich off of them. They did this by force, of course. No pretense at politeness whatsoever. No, "Excuse me Sirs and Madams, would you mind if I stole your land?" No. They just went in and grabbed.
They justified this on the basis of some very—and we mean very—sketchy claims. "We're white. We're better than they are. We're civilized. They're savages. We're theirmasters."
After a while, all of those people who were labeled as "backward" and "savage" and "uncivilized" by European colonizers got their acts together. By the early 20th century, there were anti-colonial liberation movements taking root all over the place. People were fighting back.
Sure enough, by the mid-twentieth century, one colony after another began to fall. India gained independence from the British in 1947. Ghana gained it in 1957. And then, like a line of dominoes, they all came tumbling down. French colonies like Senegal and Algeria were liberated, as were British colonies like Kenya and Saint Lucia, and Portuguese colonies like Angola and Mozambique.
But decolonization wasn't just a thing that was brought about by politicians and freedom fighters. Writers also played a very important role. Postcolonial literatureemerged at the same time that many colonies were fighting their way to independence. It really began picking up as a coherent literary movement in the mid-twentieth century. Many classic postcolonial texts were published between the 1950s and 1990s. And while drama and poetry are important in postcolonial literature, it's really the novel that defines this movement.
What the postcolonial writers did was as important as what the anti-colonial freedom fighters and activists did. That's because postcolonial writers challenged some of the basic assumptions (like "white people are better") that had justified colonialism in the first place. In other words, the writers' battlefield was the mind, while the freedom fighters' battlefield was… well, the battlefield.
Postcolonial writers—emerging from Africa, South Asia, the Caribbean, South America and other places—"wrote back" to the empire (source). They decided that the big guys—like Britain and France—had been hogging the microphone for too long. Now it was time for postcolonial writers to tell their own stories, from their own perspectives.
Once the postcolonial writers got going, boy, did they get going.
They justified this on the basis of some very—and we mean very—sketchy claims. "We're white. We're better than they are. We're civilized. They're savages. We're theirmasters."
After a while, all of those people who were labeled as "backward" and "savage" and "uncivilized" by European colonizers got their acts together. By the early 20th century, there were anti-colonial liberation movements taking root all over the place. People were fighting back.
Sure enough, by the mid-twentieth century, one colony after another began to fall. India gained independence from the British in 1947. Ghana gained it in 1957. And then, like a line of dominoes, they all came tumbling down. French colonies like Senegal and Algeria were liberated, as were British colonies like Kenya and Saint Lucia, and Portuguese colonies like Angola and Mozambique.
But decolonization wasn't just a thing that was brought about by politicians and freedom fighters. Writers also played a very important role. Postcolonial literatureemerged at the same time that many colonies were fighting their way to independence. It really began picking up as a coherent literary movement in the mid-twentieth century. Many classic postcolonial texts were published between the 1950s and 1990s. And while drama and poetry are important in postcolonial literature, it's really the novel that defines this movement.
What the postcolonial writers did was as important as what the anti-colonial freedom fighters and activists did. That's because postcolonial writers challenged some of the basic assumptions (like "white people are better") that had justified colonialism in the first place. In other words, the writers' battlefield was the mind, while the freedom fighters' battlefield was… well, the battlefield.
Postcolonial writers—emerging from Africa, South Asia, the Caribbean, South America and other places—"wrote back" to the empire (source). They decided that the big guys—like Britain and France—had been hogging the microphone for too long. Now it was time for postcolonial writers to tell their own stories, from their own perspectives.
Once the postcolonial writers got going, boy, did they get going.